houtan wrote:
Hello,
How should the following input be handled: svar_identification; exclusion lag 0; equation 1, y, c; equation 1, c, k; end;
Should this be 1) Invalid. Stop execution and tell user why 2) Valid. Combine the Symbol List to be y, c, k 3) Valid. Overwrite Symbol List as c, k and warn user
I'm guessing 1), but just wanted to make sure everyone agrees.
Yes, 1) is correct because most likely the result of the user's mistake. She would think all the restrictions on a equation in a single operation. Anybody disagrees? Best Michel
Best, Houtan
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michel Juillard <michel.juillard@ens.fr <mailto:michel.juillard@ens.fr>> wrote:
I have updated SWZ in SVN to include changes that were already present in what I presented last week.
I have added to the wiki a detailed description of the interface for SVAR exclusion restriction in http://www.dynare.org/DynareWiki/SvarExclusionInterface
the Qi and Ri matrices should be implemented by Houtan in the preprocessor. Karl and Stephane have just to write a small identification/exclusions.m and identification/lower_cholesky.m
All the best,
Michel
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org <mailto:Dev@dynare.org> http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev