Dev August 2014

dev@dynare.org

4 participants
10 discussions

Status of testsuite in 4.4 branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 15 Aug '14

15 Aug '14

2b817474cd92c8e821e2cbbc2e8e170c33d2a697 Fixes bug where number of posterior draws was computed incorrectly and wrong warning was displayed ================================ DYNARE MAKE CHECK MATLAB RESULTS ================================ | TOTAL: 432 | PASS: 430 | FAIL: 0 | XFAIL: 2 | XPASS: 0 ================================ DYNARE MAKE CHECK OCTAVE RESULTS ================================ | TOTAL: 426 | PASS: 424 | FAIL: 0 | XFAIL: 2 | XPASS: 0 A full log can be found on karaba in '/tmp/dynare-4.4-check-1yuYJ6qDn8.log'.

1 0

Status of testsuite in master branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 15 Aug '14

15 Aug '14

1 0

Status of testsuite in 4.4 branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 14 Aug '14

14 Aug '14

1 0

Status of testsuite in master branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 14 Aug '14

14 Aug '14

1 0

Status of testsuite in master branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

0f669fd974755f73618c9c8c67e849893ac01f57 New location for binary build dependencies under Windows Dynare failed to compile or MATLAB testsuite failed to run\n Dynare failed to compile or Octave testsuite failed to run\n A full log can be found on karaba in '/tmp/dynare-master-check-HYAF48SKe0.log'.

1 0

Status of testsuite in 4.4 branch
by dynbot＠dynare.org 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

28eeb74163f3d136c100450181da64642524ab29 New location for binary build dependencies under Windows Dynare failed to compile or MATLAB testsuite failed to run\n Dynare failed to compile or Octave testsuite failed to run\n A full log can be found on karaba in '/tmp/dynare-4.4-check-mMcxYcWCwk.log'.

1 0

Unit Tests for Dataset
by Johannes Pfeifer 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

Dear Stéphane, I think the unit test for loading mat-files in the new interface needs to be relaxed. It currently loads all variables in a datafile and checks for correct dimensions. This implies that no auxiliary information is allowed to be stored in the mat-file as it will results in errors. I think this is overly restrictive. We should only check for consistency of the declared observable variables and not care about other contents of the m-file. See the attached example file for a display of the problem. Best, Johannes

1 0

Status of testsuite in 4.4 branch
by sebastien＠dynare.org 02 Aug '14

02 Aug '14

1 0

Status of testsuite in master branch
by sebastien＠dynare.org 02 Aug '14

02 Aug '14

1 0

Bug in OSR
by Johannes Pfeifer 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

Hi, could someone have a look at this: http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1 <http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5923> &t=5923 This strikes me as a bug. Or are we deliberately not dealing with this, because the objective is always multiplied by four and the minimum stays the same. Best, Johannes ------ Johannes Pfeifer Department of Economics University of Mannheim L7, 3-5, Room 242 68131 Mannheim Germany +49 (0)621 181-3430

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Dev August 2014